Costa Mesa City Council drops several objectives
- Share via
Deirdre Newman
Councilman Gary Monahan succeeded in ferreting out what he considered
fluff from the City Council’s community objectives.
On Tuesday, Monahan convinced his colleagues to remove a host of
items from the city’s priority list to save precious city funds. The
state faces a $35-billion deficit, and Costa Mesa, like cities
throughout the state, can expect a loss of millions of dollars when
the 2003-04 budget is adopted later this year.
Gone are objectives such as pursuing funding and construction of a
compressed natural gas facility and the expansion of after-school
programs to the middle and high schools.
Financial officials have yet to tally the savings to the city, but
the biggest allocation freed up was $500,000 intended for Costa Mesa
Cares and other after-school programs, said Marc Puckett, director of
finance. The funds will now enter the general fund for other purposes
as needed, Puckett said.
While some residents commended the council for reducing its
priorities to prepare for shrinking funds, they emphasized the
obvious importance of including the community in the community
objectives.
“It’s mostly a council wish list,” resident Doug Sutton said.
“They may get their information from their community supporters, but
there’s no real process to go out and work with the community and
prioritize what the community would like to see.”
The allotment for Costa Mesa Cares was supposed to come out of the
Gas Tax Settlement Fund. Newport-Mesa Unified school board member
Dave Brooks, an advocate of after-school programs in the city, said
losing the funds will not be significant immediately, but could have
an adverse effect eventually.
“It’s not going to make a big difference in the short term because
of the fact that there wasn’t a method to access that money,” Brooks
said. “In the long term, it may have a real effect, and obviously it
means the ability to expand is now really curtailed.”
Councilwoman Libby Cowan dissented the most on removing some of
the priorities, including the natural gas facility and leveraging no
less than half of the anticipated revenues from IKEA to float a
20-year bond to form an underground utility district.
“The undergrounding of utilities is a very expensive [project],
and the only way we can do it in a wholesale manner is to do some
kind of bonding,” Cowan said. “Why not do it against monies that will
be there, but won’t affect, and aren’t already in, the general fund
flow?”
The city is working to create a different process to tie the
community objectives in with long-term goals, Cowan said.
All the latest on Orange County from Orange County.
Get our free TimesOC newsletter.
You may occasionally receive promotional content from the Daily Pilot.