Facebook softens its stand on bosses violating applicant privacy
It seemed Friday morning as if Facebook came out with guns blazing, aiming for employers who required applicants or employees to surrender their log-in information. Now there’s a softening of that position, a clarification.
Privacy chief Erin Egan originally wrote, toward the end of her statement: “We’ll take action to protect the privacy and security of our users, whether by engaging policymakers or, where appropriate, by initiating legal action, including by shutting down applications that abuse their privileges.â€
A decidedly more conciliatory approach was just sent to me by a Facebook spokesperson. They went from “initiating legal action†to a “engaging with policy makers and other stakeholders.â€
Here’s the statement: “We don’t think employers should be asking prospective employees to provide their passwords because we don’t think it’s right the thing to do. While we do not have any immediate plans to take legal action against any specific employers, we look forward to engaging with policy makers and other stakeholders, to help better safeguard the privacy of our users.â€
The Justice Department had said during recent congressional testimony that while entering a social networking site in violation of the terms of service is considered a federal crime, it would not prosecute for such violations.
Earlier this week, Sen. Richard Blumenthal (D-Conn.) decried the vetting practice as an “unreasonable invasion of privacy for people seeking work†and vowed to write legislation to stop it.
RELATED:
Asking job applicants for Facebook password, fair or legal?
Senator aims to ban asking job applicants for Facebook passwords
Facebook tells employers: Hands off our users’ passwordsFollow Michelle Maltais on Google+, Facebook or Twitter
More to Read
Inside the business of entertainment
The Wide Shot brings you news, analysis and insights on everything from streaming wars to production — and what it all means for the future.
You may occasionally receive promotional content from the Los Angeles Times.