Britain blocks $69-billion Microsoft-Activision deal, biggest in tech
LONDON — British regulators Wednesday blocked Microsoft’s $69-billion deal to buy video game maker Activision Blizzard, thwarting the biggest tech deal in history over worries that it would stifle competition for popular titles such as “Call of Duty†in the fast-growing cloud gaming market.
The United Kingdom’s Competition and Markets Authority said in its final report that “the only effective remedy†to the substantial loss of competition “is to prohibit the merger.†The companies have vowed to appeal.
The all-cash deal announced 15 months ago has faced stiff opposition from rival Sony, which makes the PlayStation gaming system, and also was being scrutinized by regulators in the U.S. and Europe over fears that it would give Microsoft and its Xbox console control of hit franchises such as “Call of Duty†and “World of Warcraft.â€
The U.K. watchdog’s decision “came as a surprise to most people†and heightens global uncertainty over the deal, said Liam Deane, a game industry analyst for research firm Omdia.
“It’s a big enough market to throw a pretty serious spanner in the works from Microsoft and Activision’s perspective, but things will get a lot worse if they also get the wrong decision from the European Commission in a few weeks’ time,†he said.
The British watchdog agency’s concerns centered on how the deal would affect cloud gaming, which streams to tablets, phones and other devices and frees players from the need to buy expensive consoles and gaming computers. Gamers can keep playing major Activision titles, including mobile games including “Candy Crush,†on whichever platforms they typically use.
Cloud gaming has the potential to change the industry by giving people more choice over how and where they play, said Martin Colman, chair of the Competition and Markets Authority’s independent expert panel investigating the deal.
“This means that it is vital that we protect competition in this emerging and exciting market,†he said.
In just a few years, Embracer, based in a small Swedish town, has swallowed up studios and brands to become a major player in the gaming industry.
The decision underscores Europe’s reputation as the global leader in efforts to rein in the power of Big Tech companies. A day earlier, the British government unveiled draft legislation that would give regulators more power to protect consumers from online scams and fake reviews and boost digital competition.
The decision further dims Microsoft’s hopes that a favorable outcome could help it resolve a lawsuit brought by the U.S. Federal Trade Commission. A trial before the FTC’s in-house judge is set to begin Aug. 2. The European Union’s decision, meanwhile, is due May 22.
Activision lashed out, portraying the watchdog’s decision as a bad signal to international investors in Britain at a time when its economy faces severe challenges.
The California-based game maker said it would “work aggressively†with Microsoft to appeal, asserting that the move “contradicts the ambitions of the U.K.†to be an attractive place for tech companies.
A group of video game testers is forming Microsoft’s first labor union in the U.S. It will also be the largest union in the video game industry.
“We will reassess our growth plans for the U.K. Global innovators large and small will take note that — despite all its rhetoric — the U.K. is clearly closed for business,†Activision said.
Redmond, Wash.-based Microsoft also signaled that it wasn’t ready to give up.
“We remain fully committed to this acquisition and will appeal,†President Brad Smith said in a statement. He said the British antitrust watchdog’s decision “rejects a pragmatic path to address competition concerns†and discourages tech innovation and investment in the U.K.
“We’re especially disappointed that after lengthy deliberations, this decision appears to reflect a flawed understanding of this market and the way the relevant cloud technology actually works,†Smith said.
Breaking News
Get breaking news, investigations, analysis and more signature journalism from the Los Angeles Times in your inbox.
You may occasionally receive promotional content from the Los Angeles Times.
Activision Chief Executive Bobby Kotick said in a blog post that both companies have begun working on an appeal to the U.K.’s Competition Appeal Tribunal.
It’s not the first time that British regulators have flexed their antitrust muscles on a Big Tech deal. They previously blocked Facebook parent Meta’s purchase of Giphy over fears that it would limit innovation and competition. The social media giant appealed the decision to a tribunal but lost and was forced to sell off the GIF-sharing platform.
Microsoft already has a strong position in the cloud computing market, and regulators concluded that if the Activision deal went through, it would reinforce the company’s advantage by giving it control of key game titles.
In an attempt to ease concerns, Microsoft struck deals with Nintendo and some cloud gaming providers to license Activision titles such as “Call of Duty†for 10 years, and offered the same to Sony.
Sony’s European press office did not respond to a request for comment.
The British watchdog said Wednesday that it reviewed Microsoft’s remedies “in considerable depth†but found they would require its oversight, whereas preventing the merger would allow cloud gaming to develop without intervention.
Cloud gaming is a small piece of Britain’s $6.2-billion video game market. But an expert forecast suggests that it will see explosive growth in the coming years, with user numbers tripling from the start of 2021 to the end of 2022 and the cloud game market expected to grow to a value of $1.25 billion by 2026, regulators said.
They had dropped concerns last month that the deal would hurt console gaming, saying it wouldn’t benefit Microsoft to make “Call of Duty†exclusive to its Xbox console.
Inside the business of entertainment
The Wide Shot brings you news, analysis and insights on everything from streaming wars to production — and what it all means for the future.
You may occasionally receive promotional content from the Los Angeles Times.
