Help from the skies
- Share via
Re “Just for show?” July 29
The Times lists the costs of aerial firefighting ($2,095 for one ton of retardant) but not the costs of what that ton of retardant prevents. By the way, we all gladly buy $1 bottled water; that also comes to about $2,000 a ton.
You have a point that politicians should be kept out of strategic decision-making in firefighting (good luck). But don’t mix that up with the value of effective aerial firefighting. Additionally, if existing ADS-B technologies -- a far more effective and modern form of air traffic control -- were put to use, tankers could fly at night and in smoke. If politicians really want to help, that’s a good place to start.
As a 30-plus-years aviation professional but, more important, a 2007 Grass Valley fire survivor in Lake Arrowhead, I can tell you that the “CNN drop” DC-10 tanker was a heavenly sight. It was an integral part of the team that saved our homes.
Robert Tymczyszyn
Lake Arrowhead
More to Read
Sign up for The Wild
We’ll help you find the best places to hike, bike and run, as well as the perfect silent spots for meditation and yoga.
You may occasionally receive promotional content from the Los Angeles Times.