AT&T; Plans Long-Distance Minimum Bill
- Share via
AT&T; Corp. said Friday it will begin charging new residential customers a minimum of $3 a month for long-distance phone service, a move that will affect millions of consumers as the company tries to wring more revenue from callers with tiny bills.
The move is the first significant push toward making long-distance more like such services as cable and banking, which collect monthly minimum fees regardless of customer usage.
“There has never been the notion of paying for access to long-distance, and that is what this introduces,” said Samuel A. Simon, chairman and founder of the Telecommunications Research and Action Center in Washington, a nonprofit group that monitors phone rates. “No matter how you look at it, a lot of people will be paying a lot of money for not doing anything.”
The new policy takes effect today for new residential customers signing up for a calling plan and Friday for new basic-service customers. Once in place, callers who make no long-distance calls or rack up less than $3 in charges in a given month will be assessed the difference.
For now, the minimum charge does not apply to the company’s 70 million existing customers or low-income customers who qualify for discounted service. The company also will exempt existing customers enrolled in a calling plan that has a monthly fee.
However, existing customers who change calling plans on or after Jan. 1, 1999, will be subject to the monthly charge.
Many long-distance companies already charge monthly fees or impose minimum usage requirements on customers in special calling plans, in return for lower per-minute prices on calls. But AT&T;’s new plan, which will spread to its current users over time, is a big step toward instituting minimum charges on all long-distance bills, regardless of the per-minute rate offered.
AT&T;, the nation’s largest long-distance carrier, downplayed the effect of the change, noting that just 15% of its new customers--more than 10 million people--spend less than $3 in any given month. But AT&T; said it loses $300 million a year sending bills and providing customer service to those occasional long-distance callers.
“We do care about all our customers, but we are losing money on this particular segment of the market,” said Nilda Weglarz, an AT&T; spokeswoman. “People pay monthly fees on so many things, but I think it’s just a shock for customers of AT&T.;”
MCI Communications and Sprint, the No. 2 and No. 3 U.S. carriers, said they have no plans to adopt a similar policy, although both companies already have a high percentage of customers on plans with monthly fees or minimum usage requirements.
Consumer groups immediately assailed AT&T;’s action as further proof that unregulated phone companies are moving to hit low-end users with fees while rewarding big spenders with discounts.
An estimated 40 million of U.S. long-distance customers are not enrolled in a calling plan, and about 35 million of them are AT&T; customers, according to Gene Kimmelman, co-director of Consumers Union’s Washington, D.C., office.
Those callers generally pay higher per-minute fees, ranging from 13 cents to 28 cents a minute at AT&T;, compared to the 10- to 15-cent rates available through the company’s calling plans.
“This is part of a trend toward dumping huge costs on low-volume customers and offering discounts to the high-end customers,” said Kimmelman, whose group has joined others in asking the Federal Communications Commission to consider re-regulating the long-distance companies.
Because of its roots as the nation’s long-distance monopoly, AT&T; continues to command a solid lead in customer numbers. But as heavy users have learned to shop around among the carriers, AT&T; has slowly lost some of its best customers, while keeping an estimated 20 million customers who do not make any long-distance calls in a given month, according to Brian Adamik, a senior vice president at the Yankee Group, a Boston-based research firm.
For that reason, Adamik and others are applauding AT&T;’s new strategy.
“They’re simply saying, if you want AT&T; service, you have to spend at least $3 a month,” Adamik said. “Why should 20 million people have AT&T; at their doorstep for free?
“The fact of the matter is, no one wants these people. There’s not a long line of companies waiting for these customer,” he said.
More to Read
Inside the business of entertainment
The Wide Shot brings you news, analysis and insights on everything from streaming wars to production — and what it all means for the future.
You may occasionally receive promotional content from the Los Angeles Times.