America's Baby Doctor Is Back in Business : Parenting: At 91, Dr. Benjamin Spock should be basking in retirement. But he's too worried about our children's future. - Los Angeles Times
Advertisement

Americaā€™s Baby Doctor Is Back in Business : Parenting: At 91, Dr. Benjamin Spock should be basking in retirement. But heā€™s too worried about our childrenā€™s future.

Share via
TIMES STAFF WRITER

Dr. Benjamin Spock is 91 and worried. Not about the usual things, like health--ā€I donā€™t feel great, but until two years ago I didnā€™t even feel oldā€; or love--heā€™s happily married to a woman 40 years his junior, or money--his famous child-care book still sells half a million copies each year.

Spockā€™s big problem, he says, is the realization that heā€™ll leave Americaā€™s children in a worse situation than he found them--a fact the activist says he wants to fight with each remaining breath.

So between the macrobiotic meals his wife, Mary Morgan, prepares for him; the daily massages she gives him while they recite together from the Book of Psalms; the yoga exercises, meditation, group psychotherapy sessions, swimming and nature walks they enjoy at their summer house on Penobscot Bay in Maine--Spock has written yet another book.

Advertisement

This one, he says, has nothing to do with the daily care and feeding of Americaā€™s youth. ā€œA Better World for Our Childrenā€ (National Press, 1994) is about the educational, ethical and spiritual poverty in which we are raising them, and the awful legacy he thinks we are creating.

Just ask and heā€™ll reel off his list of atrocities: ā€œInstability of marriage and the family; cruel competitiveness in business, sports and education; racial and ethnic divisiveness; materialism running rampant, with no spiritual or ethical values to offset it; increasing violence; a coarsening of our attitudes toward sex; lack of high-quality day care; an educational system that spews out children with no skills, no goals, and no preparation for productive, satisfying lives.

ā€œTote it up,ā€ he says, ā€œand you have a picture of a society speeding downhill.ā€

The good news, Spock says, is that we can reverse it all, if we start now to agree on a new set of . . . uh, ā€œexcuse the buzzword, but I have to say it . . . values .ā€

*

Spock is ultra-cautious here because heā€™s been burned before. In the 1960s, 20 years after his first child-care book was published, conservative clergyman Dr. Norman Vincent Peale vilified Spock from his New York pulpit for the baby doctorā€™s anti-Vietnam War activities, his ā€œpermissiveā€ attitude toward raising children, and for an entire generation of unpatriotic and undisciplined young people.

Advertisement

This was just a few weeks after Spock, the chaplain of Yale University and two others were convicted of ā€œconspiracy to abet resistance to the military draft.ā€ (The conviction was overturned on appeal and Spock never went to jail.)

To this day, Spock says, he hasnā€™t totally shaken the ā€œpermissiveā€ label among people who never read his books. ā€œThose who know my work realize that I was never permissive and always advocated total respect between children and adults.ā€

Even his friendly competitors agree that it was an inaccurate and undeserved slur.

ā€œSpockā€™s been my hero all along, heā€™s a wonderful man,ā€ says child-care expert Dr. T. Berry Brazelton. ā€œHeā€™s been vital to family life and children, has kept the pressure on our society to pay attention to those issues. We are the least family-oriented society in the world, and all who care about children are frightened about the future if this continues. Spockā€™s new book is one more sign of how much he cares.ā€

Advertisement

At this late stage of his career, Spock says, he doesnā€™t want to be misunderstood once again, or erroneously linked to what he considers regressive ā€œfamily values folks.ā€

ā€œIā€™m not some old geezer advocating a return to the good old days,ā€ Spock rasps by phone from his seaside retreat. ā€œI like and embrace the progress Iā€™ve seen during my lifetime.ā€

Heā€™s just not so sure about the attitudes that go with it. What we have lost while moving forward, he says, is our sense of the dignity of each individual; our desire to treat others as we want to be treated; our goal of raising children with the ideals of helpfulness, kindliness, and service to others.

These days, he says, we teach children only to want to ā€œget ahead.ā€ We include nothing spiritual to sustain them while getting there, nothing so simple and profound as the fact that we are in this world to love and help each other.

Partly because there are no such interior beacons to guide young people as they try to ā€œget aheadā€ in school or work, because we offer no sense of the dignity and importance of each individual person, rich or poor, Spock says we are seeing an increase in teen-age suicide.

If these spiritual values were brought back, he believes, America could move forward faster than ever. Our children would feel valued, educated and motivated.

Advertisement

Spock doesnā€™t pretend to know the answers to the question of how to insert spiritual values--or better day care and education--into our society. He hopes only that his book will ā€œopen up dialogue,ā€ and perhaps start some movement in what he considers the right direction. ā€œPediatrics is politics,ā€ he has said. If parents want better day care, health care and schools, theyā€™ll have to organize and demand it from the government.

*

ā€œTrust yourself. You know more than you think you do.ā€

Those were the then-shocking first words of Spockā€™s ā€œBaby and Child Care,ā€ first published in 1945. It has now sold more copies than any other book except the Bible. It has been translated into 39 languages and is updated every eight years.

Until Spock, baby books were condescending, assumed parents knew nothing, and urged them to ignore their natural instincts in favor of rigid schedules and punishing regimes. And they were warned not to hug and kiss their kids at random--only in specified instances.

Spock was a struggling pediatrician in New York City when a publisher asked him to write his thoughts on the subject. He already had a wife, Jane, one baby and one on the way.

Heā€™d spent years studying: Yale College, Columbia University Medical School, five years at the New York Psychoanalytic Institute. He took this latter course of study, he says, to learn why people behave as they do--so he could better help parents to understand themselves and their children. As a result, he became the first pediatrician to write with behavioral insight and with a comforting, explanatory tone. For the next few decades, he remained the worldā€™s baby-care guru and a father figure extraordinaire.

His own fathering qualities were somewhat lacking, he laments in his upcoming book. On the phone from Maine, he says that if he could do it over again, he would devote more time to his sons and less to moving around to further his career. And heā€™d show more physical affection to his kids too. ā€œWhen they were grown, they told me I hadnā€™t shown enough affection, hadnā€™t given them enough hugs and kisses. That hurt their feelings, made them feel unworthy of my affection.ā€

Advertisement

Both boys grew up to be ā€œwonderful people,ā€ Spock says. And both decided long ago not to answer reportersā€™ questions about life with father.

John, a Los Angeles architect, is pleasant but firm in his refusal to talk. Michael, a Chicago museum director, says heā€™s had a lifetime of such questions. ā€œIā€™m 61 years old. At a certain point, you just donā€™t want to do that any more. I will say heā€™s given us a tremendous amount. He spends his time on things he believes in deeply. That puts his life exactly where his heart is.ā€

Spock ran for President in 1972, on the Peopleā€™s Party ticket. ā€œI had no desire to be President,ā€ he says, but thousands of young idealists were disillusioned with both major parties, as Spock was, and he decided to help give them an alternate voice.

*

Although Spockā€™s new book rails against divorce, he walked out on his wife of 48 years to marry an ardent feminist heā€™d met while on the lecture circuit. That was almost 20 years ago. She was in her 30s, with a young daughter. He was in his 70s.

ā€œIf I could do things over,ā€ Spock says, ā€œIā€™d write more about step-parenting. Itā€™s one of the most difficult things Iā€™ve ever encountered. Maryā€™s daughter, Ginger, literally ignored me for the first five years we were married. It was horrible, although we finally got it all straightened out.ā€

Other than that, he says, life with his pampering Mrs. is nearly perfect. A slight stroke and a pacemaker have slowed him down of late, forcing the lovebirds to abandon their life at sea. For the past few years, he says, they had lived in tight quarters on a sailboat in the Virgin Islands during winter, and on another sailboat off Maine during summer. Two years ago they came ashore.

Advertisement

ā€œI have to admit Iā€™m getting old,ā€ Spock says. ā€œBut nobody says I have to like it.ā€

Advertisement